Of the eight issues currently "Resolved (Fix Reviewed By monkey)" which passed validation successfully, three seem to actually be failures. That is, Fogbugz shows SUCCESS when the validation report shows FAILURE. * 16577 Random should be in its own package * 16634 Rename layout to classLayout (step 2 use new accessors in the tests) * 16645 RBParser should not accept # <whitespace> and # <number> So... Am I misinterpreting the validation reports? Until this is resolved, should we require validation reports be manually checked (with a comment on the Issue) before integration? Could futher occurances be reported in a similar way to those already on... https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?16666 * Scrape the Fogbugz comment to the top of a text file. * Scrape the Validation Report into the text file. * Extract significant text into a Fogbugz comment in 16666. * Attach text file to comment. cheers -ben