Chris Cunningham wrote
Any chance I could get an account for that? I'm interested in the answer, but do not have a login to fogbugz.
I was going to say you can read it on Penelope [1] in the mean time, but 10220 does not appear there... Anyway, near the top of the page at [1] you'll see a link to register for fogbugz (I'd love to give you a direct link, but there's no permalink... hint, hint ;) [2]). Here's the current discussion while you're waiting... Edited by Clement Bera 06/06/2013 (Today) 12:29 PM Image Version changed from (No Value) to 'Pharo3.0' This is in DynamicMessageImplementor>>#writeSourceCode self writeMethodName. self writeShouldBeImplemented. self writeGetterSourceCodeIfNecessary. self writeSetterSourceCodeIfNecessary There should be a condition for writeShouldBeImplemented. Something like : self isMessageAGetter | self isMessageASetter ifFalse: [ self writeShouldBeImplemented. ] It seems that this fix it here has no side effect. However I don't like this condition, smells like dirty code. Perhaps we should add some strategies for getter and setter ? Edited by Sean DeNigris 06/06/2013 (Today) 12:49 PM "I don't like this condition, smells like dirty code" Agreed. We're building a nice little hidden switch statement here... [1] http://bugs.pharo.org/ [2] https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10262/Permalink-to-Penelope-registration-p... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Debugger-why-generated-accessors-shouldBeImplemented-t... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.