Hi,
On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:03 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Thanks!
Just a question: How about adding an extension
Symbol>>asIcon ^ ⦠look up the icon
Form>>asIcon ^ self
what if you want to have side by side two different themes to compare the best icons choices?
This is a valid concern, but I do not understand how this would work if the only thing you pass in iconName: is just one symbol: act: aBlock iconName: aSymbol entitled: aString So there needs to be a lookup. This lookup will depend on the current icon theme. So, you could open on window with one theme, switch the theme and then open another window. Or did I misunderstand something? My idea was that we leave the public API of Glamour to be: act: aBlock icon: aSymbolOrForm entitled: aString and then if you want to play with things, you can also explicitly pass one icon or another (beside relying on the default lookup behavior). What do you think? Doru
In this way we do not have to change the external interface, and only the internal implementation has to send an âasIconâ before using it?
Cheers, Doru
On Oct 12, 2016, at 10:33 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
I'm adding
act: aBlock iconName: aSymbol entitled: aString self act: aBlock icon: (self iconNamed: aSymbol) entitled: aString
and
act: aBlock iconName: aSymbol on: aCharacter entitled: aString self act: aBlock icon: (self iconNamed: aSymbol) on: aCharacter entitled: aString
and others ....
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com
"Every thing has its own flow."
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "We are all great at making mistakes."