On 26 Jan 2015, at 07:52, Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.morales@gmail.com> wrote:
Marcus, I don't see it. Why an UI tool defect should impact Behavior?
my problem is a bit that I have so much to do (there are 672 other open issuesâ¦) that I canât even think about this, so I will ignore it for now.
2015-01-26 3:49 GMT-03:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr <mailto:marcus.denker@inria.fr>>:
On 26 Jan 2015, at 07:44, Hernán Morales Durand <hernan.morales@gmail.com <mailto:hernan.morales@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to discuss case 14789 (https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-unde... <https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/14789/Nautilus-assumes-a-class-always-unde...>) because a class should be browseable even without a definition. Anonymous classes are still classes.
If Nautilus project cannot deal with the whole Smalltalk power then it is poorly designed and I wonder what's the advantage over the old OmniBrowser...
It means pushing a lot of API down to Behaviour. Do we want that?
Marcus