I really do understand. Really! There is something really strange. I checked it. So I will redo it again thanks for spotting that. On Apr 26, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
I'm using 10293cl and this fix still isn't integrated: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=724
Cheers, Hernán
2009/4/21 Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>:
this is strange since I merge and do not load. So I will redo that (reargh).
Stef On Apr 21, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
Pharo/Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.293 has been lost (overwritten by Kernel-stephane_ducasse.renggli.294 which has Kernel-michael_rueger.renggli.292 as ancestor).
Thus Pharo image 10287 miss Hernan stack top fix and a literals do: fix
This can be repaired by merge tool though... While at it, why cannot we apply a chirurgical merge ? I mean select or reject item by item
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project