Yes, that would be great. I just wander if the increased complexity pays off... normally if I am running my tests I do not have lots of tasks in mind, I will decide what to do next after seeing that my tests are green. Maybe I just want to browse some code, I do not need super fancy features. On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Guille Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:
-------- Original Message --------
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 16 Sep 2016, at 12:43, Nicolas Passerini <npasserini@gmail.com> wrote:
I think it would be nice to be able to run tests in background.
The easiest is to start multiple images⦠this way they can destroy whatever without impacting you. I think Guille has something in preparationâ¦
The nice aspect of this is that it runs really in parallel.
That is a nice feature, but if I am working on something and I make changes I would like to run the tests right where I am working.
That is a cosmethic thing.
Imagine you could run the tests on a copy of the image you were developing. If there is an error, your development image gets notified, and so you can then debug the error on your local environment.