there's no problem. you (Mariano) fixed it. i think you misunderstood Sean's mail. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck < marianopeck@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras < vonbecmann@gmail.com> wrote:
did you check this http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=4129 ?
Yes, I was the gulty. But I am still on favor. So I don't undersatnd Sean's problem.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com>wrote:
In my unit test, I want to make sure that my output equals the expectedOutput, but: TestCase>>assert: expected equals: actual
It feels wrong to me. It seems that I want to make an assertion about my class's behavior and I would like to write: self assert: output equals: expectedOutput.
What do you all think?
Thanks. Sean
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/assert-equals-feels-backwards-tp3614760p3614760.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com