Re: [Pharo-project] About the migration from PackageInfo to RPackage

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:

Hi guys

PackageInfo has a large APi that is often not used. So I would suggest that we reduce the PackageInfo API first because it will lower the stress on RPackage to be offer a compatible interface. All the methods in the compatibility should somehow disappear or only serve as purpose to help temporary backwards compat.

I agree. But if you want to remove in the future PackageInfo, then RPackage HAS to provide a way to get the classes/extension methods of a MCPackage. That's why I need #allDefinedClasses and #allDefinedExtensionMethods

What do you think?

Stef

-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com