Oh, I'm using it for Mars... but I can remove it anyway, just let me know. Cheers, Esteban On 2010-08-02 17:05:58 -0300, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> said:
I agree that it should be removed, but this means that many tools need to be rewritten in plain morphic.
do you know which ones? Because a lot of buildwith: methods are not used in fact.
Lukas
2010/8/2 Richard Durr <richard.durr@googlemail.com>:
+1. See Gilad's text about least common denominator in UI-widgetery
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:20 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:
Hi guys
during the sprint I discussed with Gary about ToolBuilder and we think that it would be better to remove it since a lot of new widgets are not covered so this means that we will be constantly limiting ourselves. Of course ToolBuilder is a nice idea (if we would have several UI framework). So far we got only one and we would have several we would have to take the smallest common denominator. Another idea would be to extend toolBuilder to support new widgets. So what do you think?
Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project