Hi Stef, Please see http://voss.logicarts.com/licensing I'm not a lawyer, so I can't say anything about the interpretation of GPLv3, except to comment without prejudice: As it is a complex subject, my intention was that users may prefer to negotiate a commercial licence with technical support, which may well be cheaper than the alternative legal services. I'm open to suggestions and negotiation, but I do need to monetise my time and effort - nobody paid me to write VOSS. Regards, John
-----Original Message----- From: stepharo [mailto:stepharo@free.fr] Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 8:57 AM To: Any question about pharo is welcome; jc@logicarts.com Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Porting Voss to Pharo
I think that the author of voss should reply.
Stef
Le 6/3/15 23:07, Stephan Eggermont a crit :
On 06/03/15 16:16, stepharo wrote:
Hi guys
if some of you are interested to drive porting VOSS to Pharo, let me know John sent me the code and I can give it to you. There is a dual license - LGPL - commercial
What does LGPL mean for VOSS? At FOSDEM I talked with Bradley Kuhn of the FSF. It is something that has been on their to do list for a while now. In the 'strict' interpretation it is as viral as GPL for smalltalk code.
Stephan
______________________________________________ This email has been scanned by Netintelligence http://www.netintelligence.com/email