Just for the sake of argument, I also don't like how things are broken down to one file per method and class being that json thing. Looks weird, and makes viewing code on github very tedious. On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Dale Henrichs < dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
Haha, sleep is overrated:)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
On 06.03.2014, at 23:34, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs@gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
My dream has finally come true ... Smalltalkers arguing the merits of git vs. mercurial!
How do you sleep at night?? :p
Alternate implementations to FileTree are welcome!
Dale
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:
The integration in Newspeak is quite different. It is file based, above mercurial (which makes no difference) but the tools one uses are in Newspeak. So mercurial really is just a back-end. Given that organizations and alphabetical order of selectors within protocols, classes within categories, etc, keeps things stable I find mercurial diffs are still pretty readable with file-specific command-line or GUI tools. Method-level granularity seems a very poor choice, IMNSHO.
+1. In St/X I do exactly the same. Works just fine.
Jan