And not just announcers, some of the tests there leave quite a footprint. I've recently discussed something similar with regards to performance of subclassing in tests http://forum.world.st/fast-subclassing-class-creation-in-tests-td4857779.htm... So Kernel-Tests might also benefit from it. Right now I've also encountered this thread http://forum.world.st/New-class-factory-for-tests-and-other-use-cases-td1297... , it's quite old (2009), but maybe it could be used instead of directly manipulating the env. On the other hand, how often do you manually trigger Kernel-Tests? CI doesn't care that much about it. Peter On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Ideally shouldn't Kernel-Tests, or tests in general, be silent and not trigger a lot of system announcers? Right now Kernel-Tests trigger around 250 announcements through the SystemAnnouncer.
Cheers, Andrei