On 20 October 2012 16:29, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich@vmware.com> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- | From: "Igor Stasenko" <siguctua@gmail.com> | To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 8:13:12 PM | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Yet another Notation format: Object literals | | On 20 October 2012 03:48, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich@vmware.com> wrote: | > | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > | From: "Igor Stasenko" <siguctua@gmail.com> | > | To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr | > | Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 4:46:47 PM | > | Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Yet another Notation format: Object | > | literals | > | | > | On 20 October 2012 00:54, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich@vmware.com> | > | wrote: | > | > Igor, | > | > | > | > It's not clear that I need to be part of this discussion. | > | > | > | > If you want to invent a new serialization format, then go for | > | > it. | > | > | > | > I did chime in with my opinion that your suggested format was | > | > not | > | > very readable. You happen to disagree with me. | > | > | > | | > | Yes, i disagree. Tell me what is not readable in this: | > | | > | #( Dictionary | > | | > | yellow (Color 1 1 0) | > | blue (Color 0 0 1) | > | red (Color 1 0 0) | > | | > | ) fromObjectLiteral. | > | > Please read my earlier description of why I think JSON is more | > readable as you haven't addressed the main points with this | > format... | | yes, because i do not regarding them as significant.
Then I don't think I should be the one that you get feedback from ... or perhaps you should re-evaluate your thoughts that they are not significant ...
At this point in time I don't see the point in discussing anything more ...
You seem to be trying to convince me that I should be able to read a format that I consider unreadable ... you don't seem to want to hear that I consider the format unreadable ...
We are done...
yes, we are :)
Dale
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.