June 21, 2015
2:04 p.m.
Alex from memory an activeRing definition is always returning the current method definition. aspassive I guess is creating one that represents a method at a certain point. and yes we should continue to improving ring.
Hi!
I have the following:
Object subclass: #A. A compile: 'foo ^ 5'. A compile: 'foo ^ 10'.
(A >> #foo) asHistoricalRingDefinition
But I have no idea how I can get the two time stamps of A>>foo and the two source code?
did you check the api?
I cannot figure out what is the difference between asPassiveRingDefinition, asActiveRingDefinition, asFullRingDefinition⦠These methods all return a RGMethodDefinition.
Yes what is different is the way they access and return their source.
Cheers, Alexandre