July 19, 2011
4:27 p.m.
Denis Kudriashov wrote:
I think not. This way is substitution of method literal.
But "self sends" stubbing required anonimous subclass creation with required methods overrides.
That sounds right. The bytecodes would be different if a self send was rerouted to another object (pushLit: instead of self). Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Stubbing-class-side-methods-tp3674065p3678562.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.