Jan. 20, 2009
2:58 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
As far as I remember, the scripting syntax of GNU Smalltalk is very close to the changeset's.
No, it is not: http://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/manual/html_node/Syntax.html It looks like it is indeed quite similar to the saphir syntax
I think that the syntax is not the most relevant part of this work. What is critical in my opinion, is to have a robust scripting facility. I do not want to use jruby to do the scripting I need to do.
It is useful, yes. However, I don't see where it fits in the Squeak UI of browsers and Monticello. Perhaps some borrowing from NewSpeak is necessary in this case -- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/