On 17 Feb 2018, at 14:56, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
mmm⦠message received :)
It was not directed especially to you, but you get the idea: it does not matter how cool the software is, it needs proper documentation for others to derive value from it.
But! I have to declare: uFFI booklet is not bad. Is just incomplete⦠(there are three small sections missing). We will never cover all possible usages and for that my idea was always to add âannexesâ with all problems emerging and answered on the list⦠so to answer also something from other mail, yes, I was planning to add that to documentation.
cheers! Esteban
On 17 Feb 2018, at 10:34, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
Fair enough.
"If it is not documented, it does not exist"
On 17 Feb 2018, at 08:37, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com> wrote:
About https://github.com/SquareBracketAssociates/Booklet-uFFI
Dear (poor) reader, since years I tried to convince people understanding FFI to finish this documentation. But I failed. Apparently documenting FFI is not important enough. So I stopped to try and in the future I will remove simply this booklet because there is nothing as bad as a half done unfinished documentation. If within 6 months this documentation stays in this bad format, I will remove it from this repository. 15 of Febrary 2018. By 15 of August if nothing changed I will remove this project and all the associated infrastructure.
S. Ducasse - ''Even jedi cannot move mountain.''