Ciao tommaso add a test :) On 8/9/14 15:18, Tommaso Dal Sasso wrote:
On 08/09/14 15:16, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
Tommaso I can give you access to the repository if you send me your SmalltalkHub user name. Cheers,
Hernán
Sure, it is dalsat Thanks,
Tommaso
2014-09-08 6:28 GMT-03:00 Tommaso Dal Sasso <tommaso.dalsasso@gmail.com <mailto:tommaso.dalsasso@gmail.com>>:
Hello everybody,
I found a bug while playing with the XMLPullParser:
When using XML entities encoded in hexadecimal the parser throws an exception. For example: is the hexadecimal encoding of which is the line feed. If you try to parse: '<tag contents="one two" />' you get a "Expected Number" error.
I investigated the problem, and found that it is caused by the method XMLPullParser>>readNumberBase:
If the base of the parsed number is not 10, it executes the following lines: numberString := self nextUpTo: $;. self stream skip: -1. [...]
However, the method nextUpTo: does not exist. A MNU is then raised and handled in nextCharReference: by a greedy "on: Error do: [:ex | self errorExpected: 'Number.']." thus causing the exception.
The solution is either to implement nextUpTo: or to change it in one of the two existing methods: nextUpToAll: or nextTrimmedBlanksUpTo: Example: numberString := self nextUpToAll: ';'.
Also, in the following line, it calls the accessor "stream", which does not exist and causes the same problem. The solution here is to change self stream skip: -1. into stream skip: -1.
The following two test cases show the problem. The first one shows the correct behavior:
XMLPullParserTest>>testASCIIEntity | parser |
parser := XMLPullParser parse: ' <tag contents="one two" />'.
self assert: (parser next at: #contents) equals: (Character lf join: #(one two))
The second one shows the error:
XMLPullParserTest>>testUnicodeEntity | parser |
parser := XMLPullParser parse: ' <tag contents="one two" />'.
self assert: (parser next at: #contents) equals: (Character lf join: #(one two))
I hope it is clear enough. I can also commit the fix myself, if you give me write access.
Thanks, Tommaso