Hi, Thanks for the answers. It's no problem that it is not in 2.0. I just wanted to make sure. It's already great that it works with 2.0. Cheers, Doru On Mar 6, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
OSProcess was not ready for 2.0 when we closed the beta, so we did not include it. Now is working fine but since we are hours from release, is not good to have it there by default now (it will be for 3.0. then)... it would be really cool to have a metacello configuration in MetaRepoForPharo20, though.
Esteban
On Mar 6, 2013, at 6:38 PM, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:
good question.
For some reason I thought that OSProcess was integrated in Pharo 2.0, but it appears that it is not in the image. Did I understand the issue incorrectly, or was the class renamed to something else?
we did not renamed the class
If it is not in the image, was it already ported to SmalltalkHub? (I could not find it)
No because david did not move it. I could do it but I was waiting for him.
I am asking because I would like to know if we should continue to load OSProcess explicitly with Moose.
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Every now and then stop and ask yourself if the war you're fighting is the right one."