If I try to match it like: Â '`@browser showOn: `@target; from: `@origin; using: [ `@browser ``@.statements]'
The match expression `@browser ``@.statements doesn't make sense. Statements (.) cannot be a message selector that would be expected after a receiver. Also, you cannot have a selector list (@) if you don't give also an argument list to match. So the closest valid thing is `@browser `message which looks for unary message sends (recursive is not necessary here either, because there is nothing to recurse into), or `@browser `@message: ``@message which looks for arbitrary message sends and recursively into all arguments.
It seems to only get those appearances which contain a single appearance of browser inside the block.
As I wrote in the previous mail you need to do it with nested rewrites. Inside the block you match for any sequence of statements: `@.statements And as replacement you use the `{ :context | ... } trick to perform a new rewrite somehow along the following untested lines: `{ :context | RBParseTreeRewriter new " replace whatever matched to `@browser with the variable a " replaceTree: (context at: '`@browser') with: (RBParser parseExpression: 'a'); " execute on the list of statements " executeTree: (context at: '`@.statements'); " return the rewritten tree " tree } Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch