I was thinking about following rules to make life easier: - a submission in PharoInbox must be a slice - slice must be formatted like LabelOfPatch-IssueNumber for example: BadCharactersInPackagenames-2124 PerformWithArgsPrimFailure-2443 - reject automatically slices which don't follow the name convention Then - it's easy to build an interface which shows queued patches (filter by package name) - it's easy to clean PharoInbox / delete required packages - more visibility to the contribution process, one way of doing things (so we can automate - hudson server which test patch integration :) What do you think ? Laurent Laffont http://pharocasts.blogspot.com/ http://magaloma.blogspot.com/ On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr
wrote:
Yes! I clean but this is really tedious
stef
On May 20, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Torsten Bergmann wrote:
Hi Stephane,
the MCZ's for HelpSystem-Core-tbn.45 HelpSystem-Core-tbn.43
were already harvested. So shouldnt this be moved to treated inbox then?
Thx T. -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project