On 03 Jun 2015, at 17:12, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Francisco Garau <francisco.garau@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3 June 2015 at 05:56, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
I think that would confuse me, and maybe break syntax highlighting. It *looks* like a message send to nothing.
That might be a good thing as there is no object needed to resolve the method lookup. You already have the "method" to evaluate, which is obviously the block.
It's a bit heretic, but the more I think, the more I like it.
Well, if its an itch you need to scratch, go ahead :) But it might be a struggle to get the community to accept it into Pharo, and hence possibly a maintenance burden for you each Pharo release.
It would make a nice tutorial how to hack the compiler for experiments⦠Marcus