Jan. 8, 2010
5:47 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
I could do everything in one build (and use Mason for the dependency resolution), but then I'd loose the nice per-build reporting of Hudson.
I don't see why... you'd just have to do a build for stage A and then one for B (which also goes through A) and so one. You're doing "unnecessary" work, I suppose, by going through A multiple times, but you're also testing that you have a correct dependency specification in the process.
Julian