Sept. 28, 2008
5:05 p.m.
100% agree. This is why I'm saying that we want to integrate extensions or reject them.
If it doesn't meet those criteria, I don't consider it safe to even experiment with.
However, if the base system doesnt support loading and unloading of things in the first place, its a bit unfair to expect a package to be unloadable, when its purpose is to fix the base package so as to be able to support loading and unloading. Once everything we use has LPF (or equivalent) then it is reasonable to expect loading an unloading to work. I admit that Kernel-Extensions has become bloated with more than just the minimum, however it has the advantage of being version controlled which changesets are not. Keith