On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/3/11 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck@gmail.com>:
Hi folks. I was playing a bit with the ClassOrganizer stuff. I thought that class comments were in the image, but it seems they are kept in the .source. Is this correct ?
They are ALWAYS kept in the .sources?
I know that the class of the instancia variable "classComment" in the ClassOrganizer can be Text, ByteString or even RemoteString. I though that only those who have RemoteString were in .sources but it seems all are there. I am correct ? is this the desired behavior ?
Yes you are. The state of these things are bunch of hacks, added over a years and really, really messy.
OK...thanks for the warning.
I presented some ideas about it in the past, but since it requires a substantial efforts to make it done, they weren't get past much the state of an ideas. :)
I would like to hear those ideas. What I want to do right now, is to be able to remove a lot of memory consumption that maybe they are not used under certain circumstances like embedded devices. For example, I would like to remove all the method categories or put a blank space. Or to remove the class comments (I though they were in the image). In summary, for those applications that can live with that, I would like to remove unnecessary data from ClassOrganization so that to low memory footprint. What do you think? Cheers Mariano
Thanks!
Mariano
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project