On 22 Sep 2014, at 09:21, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
On 22.09.2014, at 09:12, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 22 Sep 2014, at 07:30, Martin McClure <martin@hand2mouse.com> wrote:
Andres and I developed a fix at ESUG for case 11996. The search for exception handlers was not taking into account the general case of exception handlers established or exceptions signaled while already in a handler block, so could find the wrong handler.
I put the slices for this fix in the inbox a while back, but neglected to let the list know.
Is there anything else I need to do to get this integrated into 4.0?
it is important to notify about it. There are >600 issues in the tracker, that means that just solving something but not telling will only lead to action if by chance someone looks a the issue tracker entry. (which means, it is very very unlikely).
There are two ways to notify:
1) putting the issue to âfix review neededâ
I noticed that I canât do that (at least not for the issues I havenât opened myself). Donât know if thatâs a deliberate choice but if you want to delegate a bit of work (and if the behaviour can be changed of course) I suggest that everyone should be able to set that status.
I will have a look how to configure that. Marcus