Aug. 20, 2017
9:19 a.m.
On 17 August 2017 at 21:52, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com> wrote:
We should not accept such kind of behavior. name: should not change the name of the class.
I had exactly such a problem a couple of weeks ago :). I write MyClass on: foo; name: x; yourself'but I forgot the ^ return in MyClass class>>on: and so called name: on the class instead of the instance. Hilarity ensued :).