Hi, I can add it, but can you give me a bit of context? Are we talking about references to BoxedFloat64 class? Cheers. Uko
On 18 Feb 2016, at 13:55, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:
Beware, most client code should only refer to the visible façade Float and its API. BoxedFloat64 is an implementation detail and is VM dependent. We don't want client code to be VM dependent, do we? I hope those references to BoxedFloat64 are rare.
Should there be a Quality Assistant rule for this? cheers -ben
2016-02-18 11:47 GMT+01:00 Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@gmail.com>:
Because we have compiled methods with BoxedFloat64 associations in the methods literals, but the source code still shows only "Float".
17638 Browsing calls on BoxedFloat64 shows methods with reference to BoxedFloat64 in the code