On Jul 30, 2011, at 2:42 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
I believe that the license issue has been resolved with an MIT licensed release of the CameraPlugin plugin and support code.
Discussion is on vm-dev: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2011-July/008973.html>
Thanks david. This is much clearer. :) http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7654
And a copy of the MIT code is attached to a new Mantis issue here: <http://bugs.squeak.org/view_all_bug_page.php?page_number=1>
Dave
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 10:02:31AM +0200, St?phane Ducasse wrote:
It depends on a dependencies also at the vm level and how they can crip in the system.
Stef
On Jul 30, 2011, at 12:09 AM, Hilaire Fernandes wrote:
But anyway, I guess you don't want to include it in PharoCore, so the license issue is not the concern of PharoTeam, right? In the other hand, if a third party want to use it, it will have to find its own way to comply with the license.
Hilaire
Le 29/07/2011 15:20, Marcus Denker a ?crit :
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:
Sure, I attach it here.
It looks like a standard MIT license with just these extra conditions added.
And with
-- Education 0.2 -- http://blog.ofset.org/hilaire