On 03 Jan 2014, at 10:15, Jan Vrany <jan.vrany@fit.cvut.cz> wrote:
Hi Marcus (and others)
On 20 Dec 2013, at 23:10, vfclists . <vfclists@gmail.com <mailto:vfclists@gmail.com>> wrote:
Anyone noticed or tried Gravel?
"Gravel aims to be fullyANSI Smalltalk <http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/172> compatible.â
â> the author has no clue.
Marcus
I know your time is precious but still I would like to understand the above statement. I mean, why
"Gravel aims to be fullyANSI Smalltalk <http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/172> compatible.â
means the author is clueless.
Clueless is the wrong word: what I meant is that people will read it as âItâs ANSI Smalltalk, so it it Smalltalkâ. While you can make an Ansi Compatible system that clearly does not do what you think a Smalltalk should do (e.g. have become: or a thisContext). I am sure the authors know that, too. So clueless is the wrong term. Marcus