It could be good to see what extra features we want or not in SUnit because this is also sad that we limit ourselves like that (even if I value cross platofrm portability). Stef On Aug 18, 2009, at 10:48 PM, Ramon Leon wrote:
Yes, I had the same problem. I asked him and he was actually talking about "sUnit Improved".
I don't know what I should do at this point beyond just fixing the tests to run without this method. What are the plans for the sUnit that is in Pharo right now? Would it be helpful to add that method? I guess what I'm asking is there something I can do to be helpful in this regard?
Thanks!
I'll update Sandstone's tests to not use sUnit enhanced in the next day or two after I look at the change set you sent me so this isn't an issue. This isn't the first time it's come up.
Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project