On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 23:09 +0200, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
On Jul 1, 2008, at 22:11 , Norbert Hartl wrote:
I had a look at the wiki page of 3dot10 fixes.
do you mean this page? http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/ThreeDotTenFixes We need to check, I think it does not contain all changes because the final 3.10 image has version number 7159. (We should also not forget that there is a 3.10.1 and 3.10.2 with more changes.)
The wiki page is good but I have the impression that putting all changes in the issue tracker could be worth it.
If you think its not too much work, go for it.
I would create another type Type-squeak to track every update from squeak. I would prefer not to put the mantis issues into it but each squeak version. That would enable us to see if we are in sync with squeak.
But I would still point to the Mantis report since it contains important information.
Yes, I just meant that the type of the issues won't be Type-Mantis. It would be Type-Squeak instead. I include the reference to mantis in the bug description. A minute ago I found that I can't create links in issues. That is annoying. I will include them as text by now. I'm starting to dislike google code. Norbert
What do you think? I could do it in the next spare time.
That would be great. I can have a second look after you are done.
Adrian
Norbert
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project