On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for the late reply.
how Loom compares with the fixes that andreas added to the default profiler.
I am not sure about Andreas' fixes.
this is why it would be nice that you know because you should be the profiler expert :)
Loom tells you for each thread running in the VM the amount of CPU it consumes. Some screenshots should be self explaining: http://objectprofile.com/loom-screenshots.html
I do not know if the code is in squeak because this code was licensed under GPL.
Loom is MIT.
But I would like to know if your profiler takes into account the problems solved by andreas.
Any ref about this?
look into the list it was mentioned.
I did not see an announce of Loom (by the way Loom is the name of large oo memory developed by the original smalltalk team a while ago).
http://objectprofile.com/loom-download.html
I'm know that some people got problem with our profiler and I would like to see how we can improve it.
We haven't announced Loom because the Pharo version is not yet ready. Although usable, it has a very poor graphical user interface. The first goal is to have Loom replace the standard process browser.
Cheers, Alexandre
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.