On 16/7/14 19:02, Udo Schneider wrote:
All,
I'm currently making some changes to the LDAP package to make it play nicer with ActiveDirectory and SSL. Up to now all those changes were non-intrusive to the current packages. But I'm hitting a few issues now which would change the base packages.
What's the policy on this? Improving :) We need stronger and better libraries. Keeping those changes in my own fork or submitting them to a maintainer (who?).
I gave you access to the PharoExtras repo. Just add tests and build the best LDAP you want :) Make sure that everything work well and suits your needs. I'm not sure that current design is good. At least when olivier auverlot showed to me I was skeptical about the chapter we/he wrote on it.
In addition ... as far as I can see the current package is Pharo only (was Squeak). If "Pharo-only" is o.k. I could for instance integrate my stuff for LDAP-over-SSL in there directly (based on Zodiac). Excellent idea. Our goal is to make sure that people can make business.
Thanks,
Udo