On Vista with each theme I get: Watery2 5200 SoftSqueak 4651.6 StandardSqueak 4082.8 Vistary 5378.4 Watery 4979.6 StandardSqueak compares relatively favourably with Squeak 3.9. Nicer looking widgets do take more cpu of course ;-) With FreeType and Arial fonts: Watery2 6621.6 SoftSqueak 5871.4 StandardSqueak 5391.0 Vistary 7081.8 Watery 6521.8 Goes to show that you can't get something for nothing! Regards, Gary. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stéphane Ducasse" <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 10:05 AM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Call for UI gripes
on mac os 9.0 :)
Stef
On Jan 31, 2009, at 1:29 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
2009/1/31 Michael Rueger <m.rueger@acm.org>:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
On my machine I get:
Squeak 3.9: 3800ms Pharo #084: 2950ms Pharo #213: 5200ms
#084 is before Polymorph was added and #213 is the most recent version.
BTW, with OB: 8590ms.
ouch...
any obvious hotspots?
i think its not very fair to compare OB with old browser. You need more cycles to draw icons for methods, show categories in tree, not in a simple list etc. etc. If you want a real 'ouch' then compare it with MVC browser :)
Michael
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project