so ugly! Le 8/6/15 17:27, Guillermo Polito a écrit :
If not we could maybe write a yaml parser :)
It has no brackets, it is also hierarchical and it supports comments.
El lun., 8 de jun. de 2015 a la(s) 5:16 p. m., Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu>> escribió:
> On 08 Jun 2015, at 17:03, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@inria.fr <mailto:damien.cassou@inria.fr>> wrote: > > > Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu <mailto:sven@stfx.eu>> writes: > >> I am not so sure we should add that. >> >> The JSON spec explicitly does not allow comments because of fear of abuse (that the comments would be used to add semantic meaning outside the spec). > > > really? That's surprising. Comments in configuration files are very > important. Even more when the configuration files are templates for new > users.
I know some people are using STON in ways that I did not originally anticipate, that is of course cool, but writing configuration files was not the original goal. STON is a version of JSON that is closer to our object model.
Like I said, I will think about it.
> -- > Damien Cassou > http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st > > "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without > losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill >