Dec. 7, 2015
11:11 a.m.
On 07 Dec 2015, at 11:51 , EuanM <euanmee@gmail.com> wrote:
And indeed, in principle.
On 7 December 2015 at 10:51, EuanM <euanmee@gmail.com> wrote:
Verifying assumptions is the key reason why you should documents like this out for review.
Sven -
I'm confident I understand the use of UTF-8 in principal.
I can only second Sven's sentiment that you need to better differentiate code points (an abstract numerical representation of a character, where a set of such mappings define a charset, such as Unicode), and character encoding forms. (which are how code points are represented in bytes by a defined process such as UTF-8, UTF-16 etc). I know you'll probably think I'm arguing semantics again, but these are *important* semantics ;) Cheers, Henry