The question is how much will we have to backport. Because we do not have that horse power to do that for each little details. I would only backport really important fixes. Stef On Dec 27, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Nicolas Cellier wrote:
2009/12/27 Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com>:
Julian: we (stef and I) have something we don't understand. The implementation of ifEmpty: is like this in Pharo:
Collection >> ifEmpty: aBlock "Evaluate the block if I'm empty"
self isEmpty ifTrue: [ ^aBlock value ]
In Pharo 1.0rc1 it looks like this:
Collection>>ifEmpty: aBlock "Evaluate the block if I'm empty"
^ self isEmpty ifTrue: aBlock
Lukas
It sounds stupid to return nil if not empty. Should the change in 1.1 be backported ?
Nicolas
-- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project