On Jul 29, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Marcus did you pay attention that linkedList code and scheduler should be modified carefully (message send versus inlined) ? I remember an old bug that was based on the modification of atomic property due to not using message end (preemption).
Yes, we are removing possible points of interruption, not adding them. So it should be save.
Stef
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
30314 -----
11263 isNil ifTrue: to ifNil: part 3 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11263
11264 isNil ifTrue: to ifNil: part 4 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/11264/
Diff information: http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Spec-Tools-MarcusDenker.120.di... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Ring-Core-Kernel-MarcusDenker.... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Polymorph-Widgets-MarcusDenker... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Gofer-Core-MarcusDenker.196.di... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/Collections-Strings-MarcusDenk... http://smalltalkhub.com/mc/Pharo/Pharo30/main/AST-Core-MarcusDenker.180.diff