The simplest for you and On Aug 17, 2009, at 2:25 AM, John M McIntosh wrote:
On 16-Aug-09, at 2:50 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
The point is that pharoers should implement the vision not pharo. We have enough to do. The fact that pharo will succeed depends also on us as a community nor just 5 guys doing an integration of fixes.
Stef
Ok let's talk about bug http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1068&q=quit&colspec=ID%20Typ...
Part of this is the *purge* of the string Squeak from the image, so Quit Squeak Vm doesn't fire the quit logic
(a) I'd rather not have to build two VMs, one for Squeak and one for Pharo
agree. Now does the event cleaning and other have no impact on the vm level?
(b) Also I'd rather not have to answer is the Pharo VM different from the Squeak VM? agree
(c) If you take the Squeak.app and rename it all to Pharo then someone has to manage that process and ensure the Pharo clone is cloned properly from the Squeak.app
yes may be we could have a script for that
(d) if you have a Pharo.app the question then is where did it come from?
**We** could have a script for transforming squeakvm into pharo vm
(e) I do agree having a Pharo app, then seeing quit Squeak VM is very confusing, therefore people should be able to change that to suit their needs.
may be we should use platform and extend it to vm or system name
So how would people like to see how this would work.
This of course precludes any discussion of how the linux & windows versions behave and give textual feedback.
-- = = = = = ====================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = = = ======================================================================
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project