FYI, the UTC based DateAndTime that I did is not part of Squeak. http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6197 Date
Pharo's DateAndTime is not the same as Squeak's.
We are properly UTC based/aware, see #secondsSinceMidnightUTC and #julianDayNumberUTC.
It is indeed perfectly possible to represent time using one number, but it will not be a SmallInteger. And depending on precision is will be a very large number. The split julian day number - seconds since midnight feels quite logical and practical to me.
But yes, the 'date' concept is often confusing and difficult to handle in the light of timezones. To me, an old school, abstract Date object year/month/day would make sense. But then again, there are so many calendar systems, chronology is quite complicated.
BasicJulianDate ?
On 27 Aug 2014, at 01:10, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
From http://forum.world.st/What-s-up-on-build-squeak-org-tp4760266p4760319.html :
David T. Lewis wrote
I have been working on a variation of class DateAndTime that replaces its instance variables (seconds offset jdn nanos) with two instance variables, utcMicroseconds to represent microseconds elapsed since the Posix epoch, and localOffsetSeconds to represent the local time zone offset. When instantiating the time now, A single call primitiveUtcWithOffset is used to obtain these two values atomically as reported by the underlying platform.
There are several advantages to this representation of DateAndTime, the most important of which is that its magnitude is unambiguous regardless of daylight savings transitions in local time zones.
This is my attempt to address some historical baggage in Squeak. The VM reports time related to the local time zone, and the image attempts to convert to UTC (sometimes incorrectly). A UTC based representation makes the implementation of time zone tables more straightforward (see for example the Olson time zone tables in TimeZoneDatabase on SqueakMap).
I am attaching the source code as a SAR file that can be loaded into a fully updated Squeak trunk image. The conversion process is slow, so be patient if you load it.
This can be run on either an intepreter VM or Cog, but if you use Cog, please use a version dated June 2013 or later (the VM in the Squeak 4.5 all-in-one is fine).
I am also attaching a copy of LXTestDateAndTimePerformance, which can be used to compare the performance of some basic DateAndTime functions.
Performance of the UTC based DateAndTime is generally favorable compared to the original. Here is what I see on my system (smaller numbers are better).
LXTestDateAndTimePerformance test results using the original Squeak DateAndTime on an interpreter VM: { #testNow->10143 . #testEquals->30986 . #testGreaterThan->80199 . #testLessThan->75912 . #testPrintString->10429 . #testStringAsDateAndTime->44657 }
LXTestDateAndTimePerformance test results using the new UTC based DateAndTime on an interpreter VM: { #testNow->6423 . #testEquals->31625 . #testGreaterThan->22999 . #testLessThan->18514 . #testPrintString->12502 . #testStringAsDateAndTime->32912 }
(CC to Brent Pinkney, author of the excellent Squeak Chronology package)
Dave
UtcDateAndTime-dtl.sar (40K) <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4760319/0/UtcDateAndTime-dtl.sar>; LXTestDateAndTimePerformance.st (2K) <http://forum.world.st/attachment/4760319/1/LXTestDateAndTimePerformance.st&g...;
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Fwd-A-UTC-based-implementation-of-DateAndTime-tp477497... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.