csrabak wrote:
Focusing in the squeak/pharo/cuis branch, I've noticed that pharo people got really concerned in aspects that can attract market interest. They're looking for funding, fighting to have "hired people" (meaning under wages) minding "hairy aspects" of development, maintenance, documentation and some sort of "standardization", etc. Collaborators also produced interesting "printed material" (books, tutorials) but IMO such material is still very academic in nature. People in industry likes best "manual" stuff (like "foundation classes" with "methods" (messages in the case) documented, etc). IMO (again) here lies a relevant problem: there are "no foundation classes" (no "landmarks" or things that cannot be > easily changed) and it becomes apparent when people exchange ideas about "keeping this" and "getting rid of that". At least debate is going on and many issues have been addressed.
Yes.
I don't understand what was said here? Can someone elaborate? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Cobol-is-the-new-language-to-know-tp3317188p3318737.ht... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.