Because I want to have them close to the Pharo repositories :) "Everything was carefully thought" (tm) :) On May 17, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Geert Claes wrote:
Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
1) We create a squeaksource repository called Pharo10MetacelloRepository
Just a wee idea here, since there are all these ConfigurationOfXXX packages, why not have a MetacelloRepositoryForXXX (rather than XXXMetacelloRepository). Maybe ConfigurationRepositoryForXXX is a better name? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Managing-Pharo-external-packages-with-Metacello-please... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project