April 3, 2010
1:51 p.m.
On 4/3/2010 1:09 PM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
This sounds really inefficient. Did you remove the primitive send from ByteString >> #at:put:, or the following works, breaking the above constraint?
(ByteString basicNew: 1) at: 1 put: (Character value: 128)
Apologies, it's actually 256 of course. Confused it with ASCII/Latin1 compatibility. (ByteString basicNew: 1) at: 1 put: (Character value: 256); yourself will return a WideString. Michael