makes *you* less thinking :) I think in pharo, people are used to camel case. And if we use camel case, we can always use "-" for subgroups if needed (like categories, monticello packages, etc., now) Esteban On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30 January 2013 12:48, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
yep... Camillo already messed it by using C naming convention and not smalltalkish :P
CamelCase, please!
i prefer all lowcase bro. makes less thinking about which rules to follow.
Esteban
On Jan 30, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
Good! can you sync with esteban for the shape of the pharo repo?
I was thinking about
Pharo /NativeBoost /RB /Opal /
so that we have a bit but not to much structure and each subproject is one that can be loaded "independently" what do you think?
Sef
On Jan 30, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 29 January 2013 19:45, Ciprian Teodorov <ciprian.teodorov@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Igor,
I guess that I am a persona non-grata, or something... I've lost again my commit rights on squeaksource... ;) I have a fix for the tests on struct and unions so that they pass on mac and linux
I will migrate project on smalltalkhub in closest days. I don't wanna waste time on squeaksource anymore. I will inform you (and all) about the event.
Cheers,
-- Dr. Ciprian TEODOROV Ingénieur Développement CAO
tél : 06 08 54 73 48 mail : ciprian.teodorov@gmail.com www.teodorov.ro
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.