Allow me to speak a little on my ideas of a distributed meta layer and control layer in cloud deployments with Squeak/Pharo, hopefully in bounds. A distributed system must have an metadata repsoitory describing the traffic and activity. If you look at deployment, code that works with a type and version of data must be present. With packaging and dynamic loading, chunks of code registered to a data type/version in the meta demand loads a achunk to do directed work in a particular deployed image. BigData event flows and data analysis like to get replicated and relocated, in realtime. Supporting this in the meta definitional layer and the 1/2 control layer starts to do dynamic, late-binding in the network. This is the advantage Squeak/Pharo image-based environments bring to the business table. Thank you and apologies, robert On 12/16/2015 09:57 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
Is there a Pharo implementation? https://avro.apache.org/docs/1.2.0/
On 12/16/15, Robert Withers <robert.w.withers@gmail.com> wrote:
Please consider Avro.
robert
On 12/16/2015 08:58 AM, H. Hirzel wrote:
If you want to move data to Java then you probably go for JSON or a particuar XML format.
On 12/16/15, H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel@gmail.com> wrote:
No, it is a Smalltalk format.
On 12/16/15, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
2015-12-16 14:41 GMT+01:00 H. Hirzel <hannes.hirzel@gmail.com>:
It probably should be noted here as well that
Just to know does java implementation exists?
-- . .. .. ^,^ best, robert
-- . .. .. ^,^ best, robert