On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 2011-03-20 um 19:17 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux@gmx.de> wrote:
Am 2011-03-20 um 19:09 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
------- Name: VMMaker-oscog.52 Author: IgorStasenko Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am UUID: a2810aac-4423-6740-b70e-7e821b979cb4 Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50, VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51
Merge with oscog-49-51 & Esteban-50 -------
I feel like you continuously ignoring my requests to merge the code base.. and work together on merged instance of VMMaker. If you don't like this code, just say it. But don't ignore.
Its not intentional. It's simply a matter of finding time to do the
merge. Mariano posted a bug. I fixed just that bug and published. I'm not dissing you. I have very limited time.
Hmm, wouldn't applying the âdefaultâ naming scheme prevent such overwrites?
That is, now there would be VMMaker-oscog-eem.52 for Elliots version and VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.52 for Igors version. What would prevent us from that?
I don't see a naming conflict. I've been using VMMaker-oscog.NN since the beginning and Igor has been using VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.NN. This isn't about names, it's about content. Igor is miffed I didn't merge in some changes he made when I published VMMaker-oscog.52, right Igor?
No, youâobviously accidentallyâoverwrote his version of the 18th of March:
So how did Monticello allow me to do that? That's a /bad/ bug.
Name: VMMaker-oscog.52 Author: IgorStasenko Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am UUID: a2810aac-4423-6740-b70e-7e821b979cb4 Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50, VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51
Merge with oscog-49-51 & Esteban-50 <<<<
which has the same file name as yours:
Name: VMMaker-oscog.52 Author: eem Time: 20 March 2011, 9:31:20 am UUID: 1241a856-8570-4725-a069-a6d3d8a8a222 Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog.51
Fix primitiveFlushCacheByMethod for objects-as-methods. <<<<
Since oscog is, as far as I can see, a kind-of branch of the âdefaultâ VM-Maker, I think adding the developer initial/name to the Package name would be in the spirit of monticello idioms.
Except that its my branch and I've been using oscog from the start. Igor had no need to use the same name line as me. I don't want to change now. oscog refers to my branch of VMMaker for "open source Cog". cheers Eliot
So Long, -Tobias