Re: [Pharo-dev] WeakValueDictionary: shouldn't be "absent" after GC?

2017-02-21 13:07 GMT+01:00 Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com>:

But in any case, whatever the alternative you give users, they must understand the tradeoff. If all Weak*Dictionaries were subscribed by default to the weak registry for cleanup, that would provoke a lot of overhead during garbage collection.

So you think my suggestion for implementation will lead to some tradeoff? What exactly? (if yes).