On 3 November 2011 17:16, Max Leske <maxleske@gmail.com> wrote:
:-D I said: "In MY opinion"
Ok, so the .changes file serves as a backup. But shouldn't the file be optional? e.g. the source code is in the image and changes are backed up to an extra file to guard against crashes. But I think, the image should not depend on that file. Does this make more sense?
It is.
Max
On 03.11.2011, at 16:12, Sean P. DeNigris wrote:
Frank Shearar-3 wrote:
I'm tempted to say that if you've never had to use your .changes file to recover, you're not working hard enough :)
Oh my, how my *ss has been saved by the .changes file. Especially while doing dangerous but important things (e.g testing bleeding edge cog vms). I can't count the hours...
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Brainstorming-on-the-roadmap-for-first-Pharo-Consortiu... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.