Sept. 25, 2008
9:21 a.m.
On Sep 25, 2008, at 11:12 , Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Adrian Lienhard <adi@netstyle.ch> wrote:
I'd suggest the common major.minor[.maintenance] scheme starting with "1.0".
I would not start with "1.0" because it means this is already stable enough for anyone to rely upon.
isn't this exactly the goal of the release?! Only if the shipped version is reasonably stable the people will use it... Adrian